Showing posts with label Liberal Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Democrats. Show all posts

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

The GCSE is Dead - Long Live the EBacc

Michael Gove, the Education Secretary in England, has a well-known dislike for the GCSE. Yesterday, he announced plans for its abolition.

Michael Gove, Education Secretary in England
announced plans for the English Baccalaureate yesterday.

If the name English Baccalaureate rings a bell, it's because it already exists. The EBacc is currently a system used to measure the performance of schools, using the results of pupils in key subjects. Now the EBacc is to become a formal qualification.

The EBacc will be introduced for core subjects (Maths, English and Science) from 2015, with a staged introduction for other subjects. It will be based on a final exam at the end of two years' study. There will be fewer resits, no modules and no controlled assessments. All marking will be external.

There will be one exam board per EBacc subject. Exam boards will bid for the right to run an EBacc in a particular subject for a five year term.

The Liberal Democrats appear to have had a minor success by persuading the Education Secretary to drop his plans for a two-tier system, which would have been a throwback to the days of O-Levels and CSEs.

The Welsh and Northern Irish devolved governments now have a big decision to make. They may decide to follow the English lead and create new Baccalaureate exams of their own. Alternatively, they could stick with GCSEs. This approach would risk giving pupils a qualification that has been deemed to be lacking in rigour in England. One head teacher in Northern Ireland I have spoken to has already said they would consider using qualifications offered by English exam boards.

Sunday, 28 November 2010

Students are Revolting. Again.

Things are changing fast.

Sixth formers demonstrate at rises in university tuition fees
Photo from the Guardian

Students are on the move again. All across the country during November, there have been at least two days of protests, marches and sit-ins, sometimes peacefully, sometimes a little more forcefully. More protests are planned for the coming weeks.

We all know the cause of the unrest. The Government plans to allow universities to increase tuition fees. There is currently a cap of £3290 per year, but this will be removed from September 2012, replaced with a maximum of £9000 per year. Any universities wishing to charge more than £6000 per year will have to put in place measures, such as offering bursaries, to encourage students from poorer backgrounds to apply. All of these changes come about because of recommendations in the Brown Review, published in October.

You can see the Guardian's photo coverage of the demonstrations here:


and here:

On this blog we've reported on the government's plans for reform several times:

For those of us of a certain age, all of this will bring back memories of a previous set of demonstrations. In the late 1980s and early 1990s students across the country brought universities to a standstill over plans to introduce the first student loans. The size of these loans was minuscule compared with those students take out today. But the demonstrators would probably say they were vindicated, in that those loans set a precedent for and led directly to the massive debts inflicted on the student population today.

One striking difference between these protests and those of 20 years ago, however, is the involvement of school pupils. A-Level students are fully aware of the implications of the cuts on their futures, not just over the next three years, but, if the plans go ahead, for years and decades to come. The debt levels some will accrue to gain a university education are truly mind-boggling.

David Cameron is of course a prime target for blame. But Nick Clegg is taking a huge amount of criticism as well. Before the general election in May, the Liberal Democrats pledged to oppose any move to increase tuition fees. Every member of the party signed a pledge to honour this commitment and vote against any such proposal. So understandably, ever since leading his party into a coalition with the Conservatives, Clegg has been attacked for abandoning these principles. Recently, however, it emerged that the Lib Dems had considered abandoning the commitment even before the election. Talking to students and teachers, it is this that has enraged them more than anything else.

Now there is news that the government wants to cut funding to school sixth forms as well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11845857

Head teachers are warning of the drastic effects such changes could bring about, including loss of facilities and equipment, even teaching staff and an overall deterioration in the quality of A-Level teaching. Once again, on this blog, we put the case that, although we undoubtedly live in difficult times, these measures, both the university tuition fee rises and the cuts in sixth form budgets, are going far too far, far too fast.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 11 October 2010

Help! - I Can't Afford to go to Uni!

The problem
Lord Browne's report on university funding is to be published on Tuesday. It's expected to come up with a list of proposals that fit in with the theme of the government's other budget adjustments: cuts and austerity.
In short, the universities need more money. There is nothing to spare in the Education Department's budget, so, one way or another, the student will have to pay more.

Clare College and King's Chapel, Cambridge
Photograph Christian Richardt
Some kind of Graduate Tax now seems to have been ruled out. This was the Liberal Democrats' preferred option. David Cameron has spoken out against the Graduate Tax, saying that it would be unfair and wouldn't actually raise any money until 2040. Lib Dem Vince Cable, business secretary, appears now to agree.

So, we are probably left with higher tuition fees. There are already expectations that the report will recommend allowing fees to rise from the current £3,290 per year to £7,000 or more. Adding on the cost of living, many students will be leaving university £40,000 in debt. There will be changes to the threshold at which loans are to be repaid and big increases in interest rates. Student loans will become proper, market-driven financial loans, with the interest rates that are typical for personal loans.

There are problems here. Accusations are flying that the Lib Dems are abandoning their core election promises, since they made their opposition to higher fees a flagship election issue.

At the general election, every Lib Dem MP, including party leader Nick Clegg, signed a personal pledge that they would vote against any increase in tuition fees.

The party are pre-empting Lord Browne's report by highlighting "progressive" measures within it, for example that repayments on student loans will be more expensive for graduates in higher-paid jobs.
But the National Union of Students (NUS) says it is an "insult to the intelligence" to try to "re-brand" an increase in fees as "progressive".

Tuition fees appears to divide the two coalition parties so sharply, it could be the first issue to create a serious rift between them. Many Lib Dem MPs are already openly opposing the moves and threatening to vote against any legislation. Some have even spoken about the government falling. Like or hate the current government, political instability and another general election are probably the last things we need.


Some calm words of advice

If you are going to have to make the decision about your post-school future soon, whether or not to apply for university, in these straitened times, what should you do? Do you need an alternative to university? Are there alternatives?

Take comfort in the fact that the A-Level is still a gold standard in the world of education. A-Level maths is held in particularly good esteem, especially with a good grade.

Here are some ideas to consider:


Get advice. Speak to your careers adviser, your parents, your friends. Don't feel you have to take anybody else's advice, but at the same time listen carefully. They may well have some valuable insight.


Work your way through uni. There are plenty of evening and weekend jobs available for students. Make yourself the guy selling the pints, not the one drinking them. There are downsides of course: any job is a serious commitment; the hours spent at work instead of studying could damage your exam results. Don't bite off more than you can chew. Wind down the hours as exam season approaches.


Don't go to uni, get a job. For example, the banks are still recruiting, despite their problems. The entry level may not be as high as for  those with degrees, but in time you can work your way up the ladder. You'll be earning money, not accruing debt. Temping agencies are often a good place to start, especially for office work. Prove yourself a good worker and any company will be tempted to take you on full-time - it's cheaper for them.


Take a year out. Travel or get work for a year, while you think about what to do next. There doesn't have to be an instant transition from school to university.


Study abroad. There are plenty of good universities in Europe, although the fees will probably work out as much as in the UK. You get to see some of the world at the same time as getting a degree. It's worth thinking about.

Whatever you choose to do after your A-Levels, don't take this decision lightly. Remember that an education from a good British university can and will be life-changing for you. If you can afford it.